Why hackers moved from ar_lazy_preload to goldiloader
1 hacker described this switch in public comments. Their words, with links to the originals.
What hackers said about the move
“there's ar_lazy_preloader[0] or goldiloader[1] which fix many N+1s by keeping track of a context”riffraff, 2025-10-03original comment ↗
Use ar_lazy_preload? Get alerted when hackers criticize it.
Tell us the tools in your stack. When hackers start criticizing one of them, or moving to an alternative, you will hear about it first.
ar_lazy_preload vs goldiloader
| ar_lazy_preload | goldiloader | |
|---|---|---|
| Hackers who recommend | 1 | 1 |
| Hackers who criticize | 0 | 0 |
| Moved away from it | 1 | 1 |
| Moved to it | 1 | 1 |
Counts are distinct hackers in the sampled comments, not market share.
Criticism of ar_lazy_preload
No further criticism of ar_lazy_preload captured yet.
Praise for goldiloader
No further praise for goldiloader captured yet.