Why hackers moved from sqlite3vfshttp to sql.js-httpvfs
1 hacker described this switch in public comments. Their words, with links to the originals.
What hackers said about the move
“There are implementations for that: For example https://github.com/psanford/sqlite3vfshttp or https://github.com/phiresky/sql.js-httpvfs”johannes1234321, 2025-09-07original comment ↗
Use sqlite3vfshttp? Get alerted when hackers criticize it.
Tell us the tools in your stack. When hackers start criticizing one of them, or moving to an alternative, you will hear about it first.
sqlite3vfshttp vs sql.js-httpvfs
| sqlite3vfshttp | sql.js-httpvfs | |
|---|---|---|
| Hackers who recommend | 1 | 1 |
| Hackers who criticize | 0 | 0 |
| Moved away from it | 1 | 1 |
| Moved to it | 1 | 1 |
Counts are distinct hackers in the sampled comments, not market share.
Criticism of sqlite3vfshttp
No further criticism of sqlite3vfshttp captured yet.
Praise for sql.js-httpvfs
No further praise for sql.js-httpvfs captured yet.